The Writers’ Forensic Community

Welcome to The Writers’ Forensic Community, a place where fiction writers can ask questions, make comments, and exchange ideas about all things medical or forensic. The hope is that we writers can learn from each other and at the same time give a nudge to our curiosity and creativity.

To submit a question or comment, go here.

Archives: 2007: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q      

10-16-07: Wrist Slash—Murder or Suicide?

Q:            I would like to thank you in advance for your assistance, as I am now attempting to write my very first story. My question is - can a coroner distinguish between murder and suicide when the victim's wrists have been slashed, and have there been any forensics publications on such cases ?
Merav Tsary, Mevo Hamma, Israel

A:            Maybe and maybe not. If so, there are several clues the ME could use to distinguish suicide from homicide. First, a little anatomy.
            The two bones of the forearm are the radius (thumb side) and the ulna (little finger side). These bones are used to name the sides of the wrist. The radial side is the thumb side and ulnar side is the little finger side. Along the palm side of the wrist run the radial and ulnar arteries---they are on the radial and the ulnar side of the wrist respectively. Also, the nerves and the flexor tendons (the ones that allow gripping and balling the fist) run through the same areas.
            When the wrists are cut, the arteries, nerves, and tendons can be damaged or severed in any degree and in any combination. The ME would analyze the wrist wounds to determine if the victim could have done it himself or not. He will, among other things, look at these:

Angle and Direction of Cuts—Most people, when attempting suicide this way, will lay their hand palm up and slice across their wrist. This means that if the knife is in his right hand and he is cutting his left wrist (or vice versa), the blade will move in a radial to ulnar direction. If the cut moved in the opposite direction, then suicide would be less likely. If the ME saw this or if the cut was at such an odd angle that the victim could not comfortably have done it himself, then he would be suspicious that the cuts had been made by someone else.

Blood Loss---If the victim was already dead at the time the cuts were made, then there would no bleeding. Dead folks don’t bleed. So if the killer tried to make a death from some other cause—drowning or strangulation for example—look like a suicide by cutting the wrists post-mortem, the ME would know the cuts were post-mortem.

Tendons---If the cuts were deep enough to cut the tendons, then the ME would know that suicide wasn’t possible. If the tendons to the left hand were cut first, how would the person then grip the knife to make the cuts on the other wrist?

Hesitation Marks—These are marks where the blade makes shallow cuts. These are very common in suicides. Why? Because it hurts and because the person must gather the nerve to do it. This results in several minor cuts before he is able to make a cut deep enough to actually reach the blood vessels. Sort of like warming up. If the ME saw no hesitation marks, he would be suspicious.

Intoxication or Restraints---Most people wouldn’t sit still and let someone cut their wrists. So, the victim must be either restrained or intoxicated. The ME might see bruises where the victim was held or bound and if so homicide becomes more likely. He would also do toxicological exams to look for intoxicants such as alcohol and narcotics. Many suicide victims do take alcohol and drugs beforehand so the finding of the drugs is not proof the person was a victim of foul play. But, if the levels of the drugs or alcohol were such that he could not have wielded the knife, then the ME would suspect homicide.
            This was a point of contention in the 1994 death of Nirvana singer Kurt Cobain. The level of heroin in his blood at the time of his death by shotgun wound to the head was very high. The question that remains unanswered is whether he was too intoxicated to have shot himself. Opinions differ and his death remains a controversy.

11-11-07: Kidney Failure and Transplant

Q:            I need a kidney disorder that will eventually (say, over a period of
a year) require a transplant. The character in question (a 55-year-old woman) has only one functioning kidney due to a congenital defect. I'd like her symptoms to be mild at first, then progressively worse so that she must be on dialysis to survive until a donor can be found. I need her to be reasonably healthy after the transplant.
            What condition might fit this scenario? What would the symptoms be
(i.e., how would this woman feel as she gets sicker)? What might outsiders see that would cause them to worry about her? How long would her recovery be after the transplant (when could she resume normal activities)?

Karen Sandler
www.karensandler.net

A:            You picked an extremely complex and difficult medical problem to write about. It comes in so many types and flavors that it is impossible to adequately cover the subject here. But, here is an overview and this might help you construct your story.
Virtually any kidney disorder can progress to what we call Chronic Renal Failure (CRF for short). This is where the kidneys are so damaged that they no longer clean the blood, which, along with getting rid of water, is their primary function. This can be mild to very severe. Many people with CRF rock along for years before function declines to the point that dialysis and/or renal transplant are needed. This is highly variable from person to person and from underlying condition to underlying condition. This means that your character could have CRF for a few months or a decade or so and anywhere in between before either dialysis or transplant entered the picture.
            Common underlying causes of CRF are high blood pressure (a very common cause of CRF), Diabetes (another common cause), Glomerulonephritis (comes in many types and as a group are processes that inflame and damage the kidneys), many of the so-called autoimmune diseases (Lupus, Scleraderma, Dermatomyositis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and others), and many other illnesses. A common congenital problem that would work for you would be Polycystic Kidney Disease. It causes no real symptoms until CRF sets in, which can begin at almost any age.
            The symptoms vary depending on the underlying cause. In general though CRF causes fatigue, poor appetite, weight loss, and edema of the feet and hands. When it becomes severe, added symptoms could be shortness of breath, sleepiness, confusion, disorientation, coma, and death. Dialysis is used until a suitable kidney donor is located.
            Recovery from the transplant is similar to any other abdominal surgery. Four or five days to a week or so in the hospital, a few weeks of reduced activity and then by about 6 to 10 weeks more or less back to normal.
           
11-11-07: Ulcer Disease Versus Stomach Cancer

Q:            I need to know of a medical condition that isn't fatal, but has possibly serious symptoms (at least noticeable symptoms) and could be mistaken for a fatal condition at first "glance", so to speak. I read a book once that was set in the late 1800's and an ulcer was mistaken for cancer by a quack. Is that plausible, then or now?
Anne M.
http://www.allanne.com

A:            Ulcer disease—also called Peptic Ulcer Disease or PUD for short---is a common medical problem and is often confused with cancer (CA). The reason is that the symptoms of PUD and Stomach CA are essentially identical. They include upper abdominal pain, nausea, poor appetite, weight loss, indigestion and heartburn, vomiting that can be bloody, and dark stools---this is from slower bleeding into the stomach. The blood turns the stool black. And CA not infrequently occurs in the presence of stomach ulcers. So the two can easily occur together.
            The diagnosis is made by an Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy procedure---caller UGI Endoscopy for short. The MD passes a fiberoptic tube down the throat and into he stomach. He can then see the ulcer and or tumor and take biopsies, which will diagnose the CA if present. Of course, these procedures weren’t available 100 years ago—or even 40 years ago.
            So, the two diagnoses can easily be confused even by competent MDs.