The Writers’ Forensic Community

Welcome to The Writers’ Forensic Community, a place where fiction writers can ask questions, make comments, and exchange ideas about all things medical or forensic. The hope is that we writers can learn from each other and at the same time give a nudge to our curiosity and creativity.

To submit a question or comment, go here.


9-30-07: Post-Mortem Knife Wounds

Q:         In my novel, a 35-year old man is killed by a blow to the back of the head. Afterwards, in order to leave his signature, the killer repeatedly knifes the victim. The knife used is a Randall Miniature Model 14 attack knife with a 3-3/4” blade made of stainless steel, if that information is helpful. I need the killer to mutilate his victim within a 2-hour timeframe of the victim’s death. How much blood or fluid would leak from these wounds? I would like there to be as little mess as possible. I need for the victim to be knifed as early in the 2-hour time frame as possible with the least cleanup necessary.
 LDA, Grapeland, TX

A:            If the victim died from the knife injuries and the mutilation wounds were inflicted after that, then there would be very little if any bleeding. At death, the heart stops, the blood ceases to circulate, no blood enters the wounds, and no bleeding occurs. And the blood clots in 5 to 15 minutes. This means that if your killer did his deeds 5 or so minutes after the victim died there would be no blood from the wounds. And the ME would use this fact to determine that the wounds were indeed inflicted post-mortem.
            Could there be some bleeding from some of the wounds? Yes. If the victim did not die immediately but only appeared dead, which could happen if he was in shock with a very low blood pressure from internal blood loss from the knife wounds, then the wounds inflicted before his heart actually stopped would bleed a little. Also any wound inflicted within 5 minutes of death could ooze a very small amount of blood simply by the effects of gravity. But this would be very little.
            So, any wounds inflicted on your dead victim after death would not bleed and the ME would know that the wounds were post-mortem.

9-22-07: GSW to Spinal Cord

Q:            In my novel, the main character is a homicide detective who is shot in the back.  The bullet becomes lodged between her T11 and T12 vertebrae, cutting into her spinal cord and leaving her paralyzed from the waist down.  What would be a reason for the doctors to remove the bullet immediately and how long would she be in the hospital before rehabilitation was started? Also, what type of rehabilitation would she face, how long would it be before she could return home and what type of job opportunities would the police department offer her?
DCooper, Sewell, NJ
 
A:            Surgery would be done to control any bleeding and to attempt to salvage as much spinal function as possible. With this type of injury there would be direct damage to the spinal cord by the bullet and indirect damage from the fractured vertebrae in the area and from pressure as blood accumulated into what we call a hematoma. This is simply a mass of blood and it can apply pressure to the cord and make things initially look worse than they are. The surgeon would remove the bullet—if possible. He might or might not since removing it could cause more injury than leaving it in place. Usually though it is removed. He would remove any hematoma that had collected, control any bleeding, and repair the damaged vertebrae if possible. The surgery would probably be done by a neurosurgeon and an orthopedic surgeon, working together.
            Recovery is extremely variable and depends upon the exact nature of the injury, the effectiveness of the surgery, the person it happens to, and luck. So you can have it go almost anyway you want. Full recovery is possible, full hemiparesis (paralysis below the waist) is possible, and anywhere in between. Rehab is usually begun in the hospital a few days after surgery and continued after discharge. She might be in an ICU for 3 or 4 days, a regular hospital surgical bed for a week (here is where rehab would begin with simple range of motion exercises as possible and passive movement of the limbs, etc), and then she would be transferred to an in-hospital rehab unit for a few weeks. This is all very general and depends upon what’s happening with the victim and the state of the art of the hospital.
            If she indeed suffered permanent paralysis, she could perform any type of desk job such as dispatcher, records custodian, that kind of thing. She could also begin a new career in the crime lab. Many crime lab techs are previous police officers, who then train on the job in such things as fingerprints, firearms, etc.

9-14-07: Drowning Versus Nightshade Poisoning in 17th Century London

Q:            My plot takes place in 17th century London, where a young girl is poisoned (probably with deadly nightshade), then left in a lake to appear as a suicide by drowning. I need my detective to be able to find out that the victim was already dead when put in the water, or at least to see signs that would raise that suspicion. The detective is a well-educated midwife and would have some medical knowledge. I'm also not sure whether at this time such a death would be investigated via an autopsy?
Frances, UK

A:            As with virtually all poisons, nightshade leaves no visible evidence of its present in a corpse and must be found by toxicological testing, which did not exist in the 17th century.
            The evidence of drowning is usually lungs filled with water and a froth in the mouth and airways. This is from air being mixed with water as the victim tries to breath while taking in water. The problem is with timing. If the corpse is found within about 24 hours, then the examiner would expect to see the froth and lungs filled with water if the victim did indeed drown. If he did not see these he might suspect that the victim did not drown but rather was already dead. Longer than 24 hours or so that in the water and the froth can wash away and the lungs can passively fill with water so that these clues---or their absence—is no longer useful. Even today drowning is often difficult to determine.
            So, have the corpse found in less than 24 hours with relatively dry lungs and no froth and your sleuth could believe that the victim was already dead when he went in the water.
            Yes an autopsy could be done but at that time it likely wouldn’t be. Even though the first true forensic autopsies were done in the 1200’s at the University of Bolgna, the knowledge to do them wasn’t that widespread and the church still held many taboos against dissections.

9-14-07: Leg Amputation by Veterinary Student

Q:            I'm curious. Could a veterinary student amputate a woman's leg? How could they knock a person out without anesthesia? From below the knee down? How hard would this be to pull off? How much care would the woman need? How quickly could she be transported--say, put on a plane and flown to Mexico? How long until she would be up and around?
Joanna Slan

A:            Yes, a vet student who was well along in his courses could do it. It’s not that difficult. The surgery is simply cutting through the skin a few inches below the knee joint and peeling the skin back—this will leave a skin flap to close the wound. Then the ligaments of the knee joint would be cut through and the lower part of the leg removed. The wound would be cleaned and the flap would be sewn closed over the stump. She would need pain meds and antibiotics but unless an infection set in she would do well. Remember these have been done on battlefields for centuries with great success---except for that little infection problem in the pre-antibiotic era—before the 1940s.
            As for anesthesia there are a few options. Vets often use Ketamine in their offices for animal anesthesia and this can be easily stolen and used. Tricky since too much and the victim will stop breathing and die. But if he carefully gave a little at a time, the person could be kept in a more or less twilight state and the surgery could be done. Not without some pain, bit at least not as much as if fully awake---which is the way it was done in war. More could be used if he also stole a mask and Ambu bag---this is a football=shaped rubber bag that is attached to a face mask and squeezed to breath for the person. It acts like a bellows and each squeeze forces air into the mask and then into the person’s mouth and lungs. This would have to be kept up until the anesthesia wore off—maybe a half an hour or so.
            Another options would be a regional anesthesia. Also in the clinic there would be needles, syringes, and the local anesthetic Lidocaine---it’s the stuff used before you get stitches. An injection in the groin where the major nerves leave the abdomen and pass into the leg would block these nerves and numb the entire leg. It would wear off after about an hour or two. The surgery would be done during its effective stage.
            She would be able to travel in 24 to 48 hours if necessary and would need pain meds and antibiotics and keeping the wound clean for a couple of weeks. If all went well she would be out of bed and on crutches in only 3 or 4 days.

9-12-07: Treatment of Ulcer Disease

Q:            I plan on opening my story with the 25-year-old male main character (in good health, but taking a lot of aspirin due to constant stress from overwork) collapsing from a bleeding ulcer. He'll be discovered within a half-hour and rushed to the hospital in time...but I'd like to know the following regarding the aftermath (and I understand time frames would be estimates, since it's different for everyone!): Any possible reasons for why drug therapy might not work and surgery would be required? How long they'd probably try the drug therapy? How long after surgery he'd be expected to stay in the hospital? If there were any dietary changes he'd have to make while the ulcer healed?
IC, Chicago, IL

A:             This is a big topic and impossible to cover completely, but I’ll give you an overview of how this disease is treated. Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD for short med jargon) comes in many flavors. One of these is bleeding. This can result from minor irritations of the lining of the stomach or duodenum (very upper portion of the small intestine) or from large ulcer craters in either of these areas. And anywhere is between these two. Treatment is with replacing blood via transfusion—if necessary due to a large degree of blood loss—and the institution of acid blocking drugs such as Tagamet, Prilosec, Protonix, and the many others. If this works and if the bleeding stops and the ulcer begins to heal, then great. But if the bleeding is severe in the first place or if it doesn’t cease with this more conservative treatment, then surgery is often necessary. It can go either way and if often not predictable so you can have it either way in your story.
            The patient would remain on these meds for several months at least whether he required surgery or not. Some people stay on one or the other for many years. Drug treatment is always preferred and would be used as long as needed. Surgery is always reserved for emergent situations or as a last resort.
            If he did have surgery and if all went well he could go home anywhere from 3 or 4 days to a couple of weeks. Again, this is highly variable and depends upon many factors.
            Diet therapy is controversial since the data that shows that it helps is not very strong. Patients are told to avoid aspirin and any other OTC anti-inflammatory meds—except Tylenol which is OK---and alcohol. Also foods that cause indigestion or pain—and this varies from person to person—should be avoided.
            So, the treatment, complications, and long-term effects of PUD are highly variable but this info should help you construct your story.

9-7-07: What Happens When a Meth User Dies in the Desert?

Q:            A character in my script is stranded in the desert. He is a Meth drug addict. He dies of dehydration after walking miles without water in a California desert.   Temperature is 112-115 F. What possible, as well as probable, events take place as the body shuts down? What are the visual characteristics on the body? What differences need to be factored in for a companion to survive? 
Carla King, Los Angeles, CA

A:            The two factors that would lead to death are dehydration and heat stroke. Dehydration is the loss of body water. The rate at which we lose water depends upon several factors such as the ambient temperature (the higher the faster the loss from sweating), activity (water is lost through the lungs with each breathe and exercise increases breathing), medications or drugs (alcohol and diuretics both cause water loss through the kidneys), and other factors.
            The symptoms of dehydration are thirst, fatigue, dry mouth, nausea, sleepiness, shortness of breath, weakness, muscle cramps, a rise in body temperature (heat stroke), delusions, delirium, hallucinations, loss of coordination and finally collapse, coma, and death, more or less in that order of appearance. The rapidity with which dehydration (and heat stroke) occurs will dictate how quickly these symptoms appear and how severe they are. Organ damage is primarily the kidneys, which can be severely and irreversibly damaged with severe or prolonged dehydration.
            If left untreated, dehydration can lead to heat stroke. This is when the elevated internal body heat damages the brain. The body depends upon sweating and evaporation to lower body heart. Dehydration lessens seating and thus body temperature can’t be regulated properly. Eventually, the body core temperature will begin to rise and this is a very dangerous situation. With the onset of heat stroke, sweating ceases and the body temp rises dramatically---106, 108, 110. This basically fries the brain and causes death.
            In your scenario, the dehydration would likely come on fairly quickly in view of the very high temperatures you mentioned. In the Meth user it would come on much faster than in the other person. The reason is that meth and other amphetamines in and of themselves cause dehydration and elevated body temperature and these effects work in concert with the environment to make the severity and rate of progression of dehydration and heat stroke much greater.
            How long? It’s highly variable but it could be as little as a few hours or as mush as a couple of days. So, have it your way. I’d give the meth user 4 to 8 hours and the other person a couple of days. That should work for your scenario.
            Both would be appear gaunt and drawn. Of course, one would look dead (more pale and waxy) and the other alive (flushed and sunburned). Otherwise there would be no visible difference.
            A word about mirages. Once the body temp gets above 103 or 104 or so, the mind isn't so sharp. The victim will not be able to think well and may literally wander in circles or hallucinate. Mirages can be seen as a result. Mirages are due to the physics of light. The heat rising from a desert or a road bends light rays due to changes in density of the air. The result is that you see blue sky below the horizon and it looks like a body of water. Often a person who is dehydrated and confused will rush blindly toward it, but can never reach it because it doesn't exist and because the optical illusion keeps moving away from them, so to speak.
            Once your surviving victim is found, treatment consists of re-hydration with water both orally and intravenously (IV) and lowering the body temperature by spraying or soaking the person with water and simple fanning with a towel or similar object. The water acts like sweat and the fanning hastens evaporation, which draws away heat. With heat stroke an ice bath might be used to rapidly lower the body temperature.

8-27-07: Tampering with Oxygen Mask to Kill Cancer Victim

Q:            I've got a man in his 60's who is dying (I gave him cancer, but really it could be anything convenient for the scenario I'm describing). He is being cared for at home by his wife and his niece (who is a nurse), along with help from a local hospice group. He has trouble breathing and sometimes needs a mask put over his face (oxygen, I'm guessing), to help him out. The oxygen is in a tank behind his bed.
            One afternoon he needs the mask, but when they put it on him, he dies anyway. His death seems natural. It's not until autopsy that they realize he was murdered: There at the end, he wasn't breathing oxygen through the mask at all but some other substance that had been put into the tank (or that tank was switched out for another) and the substance killed him.
            What deadly substance was substituted for the oxygen? Would it have a smell? How would the autopsy reveal that this is what happened?
            I'd like the fatal gas to be as simple as possible, something easily attainable by any of the 5 suspects. It would also be fine if someone could've just changed the settings on the oxygen or some other gas that would be present anyway and that's what killed him. The most important part of the scene is that they have to think it was a natural death until autopsy (though a whiff of some strange odor would be fine.)
Mindy Starns Clark
www.mindystarnsclark.com

A:            There are several possibilities but three that would be very easy for your killer to employ.

1—Simply not turning on the oxygen and having him continue breathing only room air. If he were very ill with severe lung disease, and particularly if he was taking pain meds, which would suppress his respiratory drive, this alone could make him gradually slip into a coma, stop breathing, and die.

2—If he had what we call Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which is basically emphysema and similar diseases, he would be very sensitive to high oxygen (O2) levels. The physiology here is complex but the bottom line is that people with severe COPD can slow or even stop their breathing if exposed to high levels of O2. So your killer could turn up the oxygen. Normally these tank masks combinations are set at a flow rate of 2 liters of O2 per minute. If the valve on the tank were turned up to say 10 liters/minute the victim would gradually slow his breathing and eventually stop and die from asphyxia. This could take anywhere for 15 minutes to a n hour so you have a bit of leeway here.

If the gauges were returned to normal after the victim died and before he was seen by investigators or other witnesses, then the cause of death might never be determined since there are no laboratory or autopsy findings in these situations.

3--Carbon monoxide (CO) would also work. The killer could extend a small hose—or a garden hose—from a car tail pipe in the garage or the driveway just outside the window to the mask the victim was wearing. This is a very deadly situation that comes from the unique chemistry of CO.
            CO is a tasteless, odorless, colorless gas that is completely undetectable by humans. It’s treachery lies in its great affinity for hemoglobin, the O2-carrying molecule within our red blood cells (RBCs). When inhaled, CO binds to hemoglobin producing carboxyhemoglobin. It does so 300 times more readily than does oxygen and thus displaces oxygen. In other words, if the hemoglobin is presented with both oxygen and carbon monoxide it is 300 times more likely to combine with the CO. The result is that the blood that leaves the lungs and heads toward the body is rich in CO (carboxyhemoglobin) and poor in 02 (oxyhemaglobin).
            This strong affinity of hemoglobin for CO means that very high blood levels can occur by breathing air that contains only small amounts of CO. For example, breathing air that contains a carbon monoxide level as low as 0.2 % may lead to blood CO saturations greater than 60% after only 30 to 45 minutes. So, a faulty heater or smoldering fire that produces only a small amount of CO becomes increasingly deadly with each passing minute. Same for an idling car engine that produces fairly large amounts of CO.
            At autopsy the ME would be able to determine the cause of death by looking at the color of the body, the internal organs, and by measuring the carboxyhemoglobin level in the victim’s blood and tissues.
            Carboxyhemoglobin is bright red in color and imparts this hue to the blood. When the ME performs an autopsy and sees bright cherry-red blood, he will suspect CO poisoning as the cause of death. This finding does not absolutely specific since cyanide inhalation or ingestion can also result in bright cherry red blood and tissues. Also, individuals dying from cold exposure or corpses exposed to very low temperatures may show bright red blood. Livor mortis (lividity) in these situations may also be red or pink rather than the usual blue-gray color.
            The internal organs in victims of CO intoxication are often bright red. Interestingly, this color does not fade with embalming or when samples taken by the ME are fixed in formaldehyde as part of the preparation of microscopic slides. At times the presence of CO can be found in the blood as long as 6 months after death.
            The actual degree of exposure to CO is typically measured by determining the percent of the hemoglobin that is carboxyhemoglobin. The signs and symptoms of CO toxicity correlate with these levels. The normal level is 1 to 3%, but may be as high as 7 to 10% in smokers. At levels of 10 to 20%, headache and a poor ability to concentrate on complex tasks occur. Between 30 and 40%, headaches become severe and throbbing and nausea, vomiting, faintness, and lethargy appear. Pulse and breathing rates will increase noticeably. Between 40 and 60% the victim will become confused, disoriented, weak, and will display extremely poor coordination. Above 60% coma and death are likely. These are general ranges since the actual effect of rising CO levels varies from person to person. Your victim could have any or all of these symptoms or could simply stop breathing and die.
            In the elderly and those with heart or lung disease, levels as low as 20 percent may be lethal. Victims of car exhaust suicide or those that die from fire in an enclosed room may reach 90 percent.
            Your ME would see the reddish lividity, the red coloration of the internal organs, and finally find an elevated carboxyhemoglobin level and would know the victim died of CO toxicity.

8-12-07: How is a Glass Laceration of an Artery Treated in the Field?

Q:            The villain of the piece falls through a glass table, and sustains injuries that would be fatal if he didn't receive immediate first aid. The protagonist is a medical student, and does the necessary to save his life, before phoning an ambulance (and leaving the scene). What would be the best injury that combines imminent risk to life with suitability for on the spot intervention? Could skilled first aid treat a wound to the femoral artery?
Iain Rowan, UK
www.iainrowan.com

A:            An injury to any major artery would work for your scenario. The femoral artery in the groin or the popliteal artery in the leg—runs behind the knee—would each bleed profusely if cut by the glass. In the arm, the brachial artery (upper arm) or the radial artery (forearm, thumb side) or the ulnar artery (forearm, little finger side) would also bleed if cut. In any case the goal of treatment in the field is to control the bleeding until help arrives or the victim can be transported to help. Applying a tourniquet above the wound if possible would help. This could be a rubber tube, a cord, a belt, a tie, a bra, anything. Also direct pressure over the wound would help stop the bleeding. Then the victim would have to get to where a surgical repair could take place if he was going to survive and save his arm or leg. Anyone with basic first aid knowledge should know how to do this. And a medical student surely should know. Whether they can or not depends upon them. Some people freak in such situations while others do what’s necessary.

7-28-07: What Happens When Someone Dies from an Asthmatic Attack?

Q:            A character in the book I'm working on is 54 year-old, male, a heavy smoker who has had asthma since he was a boy.  Under conditions of high stress, he suffers a fatal asthma attack. I'd like your help describing what he would experience and how it would appear to an observer.
Joel Goldman
http://www.joelgoldman.com

A:            Asthma is a disease of the airways where they spasm (reduce in diameter due to the contraction of muscles around the small airways in the lungs). This spasm can be precipitated by many things such as smoke, pollution, allergies to pollen or anything else, and indeed stress.
            As air enters the lungs, it passes through the trachea (windpipe), through the bronchial tubes, through the bronchioles (very small bronchial tubes), and into the alveoli (air sacs). It is in the alveoli that oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) are exchanged with the bloodstream. In asthma, the tiny bronchioles spasm and dramatically reduce the amount of air reaching the alveoli and thus the blood.
            Breathing involves inspiration and expiration. Inspiration is an active process, involving contraction of the diaphragm and of the inspiratory muscles between the ribs. Expiration is a more passive process that occurs due the elastic recoil of the diaphragm, the chest wall, and the lungs. At rest anyway. With exercise, the lungs must move air much more rapidly. To do this other muscles between the ribs are activated. These are called the expiratory muscles. When a sedentary person decides to take a run and develops pain in his ribs—slang would be a stitch in the side—this is due to the use of these expiratory muscles that is this case aren’t conditioned very well. They cramp from overwork and the pain occurs. The medical term is Work of Breathing. At rest the work of breathing is little. With exercise, it increases due to an increase in the action of both the inspiratory and expiratory muscles.
            The same thing happens during an asthma attack. Here the air flow is restricted by the spasm of the bronchioles so that the victim has to use great effort to draw air in and get air out of the lungs. The work of breathing rises dramatically. The analogy would be to place a clothes pin on your nose and a spool in your mouth and try to climb stairs. The lungs would work very hard to draw air through the spool’s tiny opening. Asthma is much like this.
            So, during an asthma attack, the supply-demand ratio drops. Less air enters the lungs and the effort it takes to get air is dramatically increased. This leads to a rapid decline in the amount of O2 in the blood and a rise in CO2. The elevation of CO2 causes acidosis (a rise in the amount of acid in the blood) and this can lead to a cardiac arrhythmia and death.
            The symptoms of an asthmatic attack reflect all these physiological derangements. The victim would become short of breath and his breathing would become quicker. He might also purse his lips in an effort to keep the airways open by applying some back pressure. He would wheeze, which is the sound of the air being pulled back and forth through the narrowed airways. He might experience a pressure in his chest and “stitch” in is side. He would sweat since he is working so hard to breath. He would quickly run out of energy as the O2 level in his blood dropped. He would not be able to fight or run away and might sit or lie of the floor and might even collapse. He would appear pale and then would develop what is called cyanosis. This is a bluish tinge of the fingers, toes, ears, and around the mouth. This is due to the dramatic drop in O2 in the blood. Blood poor in O2 is purple as opposed to the red of blood rich in O2. This causes the cyanosis.
            As things continued to spiral downhill, he would confused and disoriented and would lose all coordination. Again, due to the decline in O2 in the blood. His gasps for breath would progressively weaken—like a fish out of water--and he would lose consciousness and die from either asphyxia or a cardiac arrhythmia.

7-27-057: Drum Stick to the Throat (Not a Chicken Leg!!!)

Q:            I am working on a short story and when it opens my protagonist finds a Nashville singer-songwriter dead in the upstairs writers’ room at the Hog’s Breath Saloon – home of the KW Songwriters Festival. He has had a drum stick, whittled sharp, stuck through his throat from the front. My question is, how much will he bleed? How badly would he bleed and how long will it take him to die? Also, would he be able to remove the drum stick? A friend with military intelligence (oxymoron) has told me the vic would bleed profusely and still be able to attack the killer before dying. If that is true, is there a way to make the drumstick more deadly? I really want to keep it in the throat, driven in an upward motion.
Michael Haskins, Key West, FL
www.michaelhaskins.net

A:            Yes a sharpened stick of any king, including a drumstick, can kill if plunged into someone’s throat. If the stick went through the trachea (windpipe) or larynx (voice box or Adam’s Apple), then there would be some bleeding, but not a great amount. Here the victim could die from asphyxiation as the trachea or the larynx could collapse and block the passage of air. Also, blood could enter the lungs and the victim could essentially drown in his own blood.
            If the stick also punctured the thyroid gland, part of which passes over the trachea just above the larynx, all the above would happen but there would be even more bleeding, both externally and into the lungs.
            Or, if the stick punctured one of the carotid arteries, bleeding would be massive and pulsatile and the victim could die very quickly. The two carotid arteries lie on either side of the trachea and carry about 90% of the blood that supplies the brain. When damaged, blood to the brain is blocked and this can lead to loss of consciousness and death in seconds or a minute or so.
            Or the victim could survive any of these injuries. People are tough and are for the most part hard to kill. So, yes, even with a stink in is throat the victim could fight back or run away or do just about anything. He could pull the stink out or leave it in place. He could get medical care quickly or not for hours and could survive in either case. Or he could collapse and die very quickly. And anything in between. Injuries such as this are very unpredictable.

7-27-07: Erectile Dysfunction After Head Injury

I am working on a novel in which my villain suffers from impotence (Erectile Dysfunction). The scenario I am working on is that as an adolescent he suffered a severe head trauma when he was hit in the head by a turnbuckle on a fishing trawler. Can ED in an adult be caused by a severe head trauma as an adolescent?
Vaughn C. Hardacker, Litchfield, NH

A:            This is very unlikely but possible. There is a medical condition that can follow blunt head trauma that could cause ED. Rarely a blow to the head will damage the pituitary gland. This is called the master gland since it controls so many endocrine functions within the body. It sits at the base of the brain and is protected by a tiny---little finger-tip-sized—cup in the base of the skull. This bony cup is called the Sella Turcica. If the pituitary is damaged by the transmitted blow its blood supply might be interrupted and the gland can essentially die. This leaves behind and empty cup so ir called the Empty Sella Syndrome. This can cause no problems whatsoever or the person can have various types of endocrine (hormonal) problems. One of these can be a reduction in sex hormone production by the adrenal glands that sit above the kidneys on each side. It’s very complex chemistry, but the bottom line I that the victim could have very low sex hormones and could easily be impotent as a result.

7-8-07: Peri-Mortem Bruises

Q:            How long do bruises remain visible after death? With the added complication that the victim -- cause of death was blunt force trauma -- was bled out through the carotid almost immediately after death. Would bruises from her final struggle still be visible after she'd been autopsied and in the morgue a couple of weeks?
D.L. Beltz. Topanga, CA

A:            Bruises occur whenever the small blood vessels are damaged by trauma and blood leaks from them into the surrounding tissues. They begin to form immediately after the trauma and are often immediately visible. At other times they might not be visible for many minutes, even an hour. This is the time required for the blood to spread upward toward the surface of the skin. So, yes, your victim, who was killed by blunt force trauma before being bled, would have visible bruising in the area of the trauma. And they would remain until the corpse decayed. Healing and fading of a bruise requires that the victim be alive and the blood be flowing into the area so the blood can be carried away from the bruised tissues. After death, all this ceases and the bruise remains fixed. So they would be easily seen at autopsy.
            Also, for your killer to bleed his victim he must do it fairly quickly---within 15 minutes of death or less. The reason is that blood clots in 5 to 15 minutes after death and after that bleeding isn’t possible. Embalmers remove blood by forcing embalming fluid through the vascular system under pressure so if your killer has such a set up he could force water of embalming fluid, etc into the veins and wash the blood out that way. But simply cutting the carotids and hanging the victim so that gravity will evacuate the blood won’t work unless it is done almost immediately after death.

7-8-07: Stomach Contents in Decayed Corpse

Q:            In my book the two hit men attempt to make their victim’s murder look like a suicide, using antidepressant tablets (amitriptyline) and finishing off with an injection of heroin. The heroin is the cause of death, the tablets used merely as distraction for the investigating officers. The murderers force the victim to take the tablets, wait two hours, and then inject.
             I understand that many tablets will still be in the stomach at the time of autopsy, and that the tissues of face and neck would show bruising, but would this evidence still be present if putrefaction were reasonably advanced (say three weeks after death)?
             And if the victim managed to bite one of his assailants, would it be possible at this time to find any evidence of this in the victim’s mouth?
Lina T, South West England

A:            What is found depends upon the degree of putrefaction of the corpse. And this depends upon the ambient temperature and humidity. The warmer and damper the area the faster the decay process proceeds. So, after 3 weeks a corpse in Florida in august will be severely decayed, perhaps even filly skeletonized, while one in the Colorado mountains in April will be well preserved.
            In a well-preserved corpse, the ME might find undigested pills in the stomach, amitriptyline and heroin (Actually mono-acetylmorphine-this is the molecule that heroin is converted to almost immediately after injection and is what is tested for in suspected heroin overdoses) in the blood, and the needle mark left by the injection. If the corpse is severely decayed, he might find none of this. And anywhere in between. So, it depends upon the location of the corpse and the season of the year.
            The same is true for any biological materials (tissue or blood) that might be in the victim’s mouth or on her teeth. If the body is well-preserved, then DNA of her attacker might be found. If decayed, probably not as these tissues and blood would also decay.